On 3/13/19 11:42 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > The slirp COPYRIGHT file is a BSD-3 license.
Is it? I only see 2 clauses listed there. My understanding (although I may be wrong) is that 2-clause can be strengthened to 3-clause unilaterally, but 3-clause cannot be weakened to 2-clause without copyright owner buy-in. > Instead of referring to > another project file, the SPDX license notice present in all source > files states that unequivocally. Should we put this patch before 2/4? You'd have to reword things if you do it in that order, though. > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> > --- > +++ b/slirp/src/debug.h > @@ -1,9 +1,6 @@ > /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause */ > /* > * Copyright (c) 1995 Danny Gasparovski. > - * > - * Please read the file COPYRIGHT for the > - * terms and conditions of the copyright. If we resolve the issue about slirp/COPYRIGHT being 2-clause or 3-clause, and we are happy with the addition of the SPDX tag in 2/4, then this change makes sense. But I'm hesitant to give R-b to this one without resolving those questions first. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature