Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 03:57:43PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > Hi Alex,
>> > thanks also for the other patch series that I'm testing right now to speed
>> > up Travis :)
>> >
>> > Just a comment below:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:48:57PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> >> This build keeps timing out on Travis and it's unlikely including the
>> >> additional guest front-ends will catch any failures in the fallback
>> >> code.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
>> >> ---
>> >> .travis.yml | 2 +-
>> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
>> >> index 3fb3dab46e..2e06aee9d0 100644
>> >> --- a/.travis.yml
>> >> +++ b/.travis.yml
>> >> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ matrix:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> - env:
>> >> - - CONFIG="--disable-linux-aio --disable-cap-ng --disable-attr
>> >> --disable-brlapi --disable-libusb --disable-user --disable-replication"
>> >> + - CONFIG="--disable-linux-aio --disable-cap-ng --disable-attr
>> >> --disable-brlapi --disable-libusb --disable-replication
>> >> --target-list=${MAIN_SOFTMMU_TARGETS}"
>> >>
>> >
>> > Is removing --disable-user intentional here?
>>
>> Yes - --disable-user just removes all user mode targets from the default
>> target list. However as we are now explicitly listing the softmmu
>> targets it is redundant.
>>
>
> Clear! Sorry for the stupid question!
There are no stupid questions ;-)
>
> Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarz...@redhat.com>
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
--
Alex Bennée
