28.03.2019 13:04, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Thu 28 Mar 2019 10:45:51 AM CET, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> - for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
>>> - if (i->backing->frozen) {
>>> + for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
>>> + if (i->backing && i->backing->frozen) {
>>
>> may be a bit more plain conversion would be just add assert(i == base)
>> after each loop, but I'm OK with this too.
>
> It's not necessary, because the loop can only stop when i == base
> already, so that assertion is always going to be true.
>
> If you mean
yes
> that we should keep everything as it was before and simply
> add that assertion then that's not enough. If base == NULL then the loop
> will stop when i->backing == NULL, not when i == base.
and yes, I'm wrong.
>
> Berto
>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
