Like Xu <like...@linux.intel.com> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  include/hw/arm/virt.h   | 2 +-
>  include/hw/boards.h     | 8 ++++++++
>  include/sysemu/sysemu.h | 2 +-
>  vl.c                    | 7 ++++++-
>  4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> index 507517c..724da0c 100644
> --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ typedef struct {
>      struct arm_boot_info bootinfo;
>      MemMapEntry *memmap;
>      const int *irqmap;
> -    int smp_cpus;
> +    unsigned int smp_cpus;

This seem unrelated to the rest of the change.

>      void *fdt;
>      int fdt_size;
<snip>
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/sysemu.h b/include/sysemu/sysemu.h
> index 6065d9e..c0d7d7c 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/sysemu.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/sysemu.h
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ extern const char *keyboard_layout;
>  extern int win2k_install_hack;
>  extern int alt_grab;
>  extern int ctrl_grab;
> -extern int smp_cpus;
> +extern unsigned int smp_cpus;

Along with this. Is this meant to align with what is currently defined
as smp_cpus in vl.c? Maybe these changes should be rolled together with
that before the patch to introduce the new topology structure?

--
Alex Bennée

Reply via email to