On 20.03.19 18:26, John Snow wrote: > > > On 2/27/19 8:18 AM, Max Reitz wrote: >> On 27.02.19 14:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: >>> No reasons for not reporting found corruptions as corruptions in case >>> of some internal errors, especially in case of just failed to fix l2 >>> entry (and in this case, missed corruptions may influence comparing >>> logic, when we calculate difference between corruptions fields of two >>> results) >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com> >>> --- >>> block/qcow2-refcount.c | 19 +++++++++---------- >>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> >> >> I'll be on PTO for a couple of weeks, so it doesn't make sense for me to >> take this series to my branch now, though... >> >> Max >> > > Should we have staged this somewhere else? Is it non-applicable for > 4.0.0-rc1?
I was counting on the fact that I'm not the only maintainer. O:-) > I suppose these are not "fixes." Some are. Hm. But probably not for rc2, I think... I'll think about it until Monday, but now this series probably should go to block-next. Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
