> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Snow [mailto:js...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 5:07 AM
> To: Zhang, Chen <chen.zh...@intel.com>; Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu>;
> qemu-dev <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fam Zheng <f...@euphon.net>
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add unmaintained bitmap
> file to related field
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/29/19 4:20 PM, Zhang Chen wrote:
> > From: Zhang Chen <chen.zh...@intel.com>
> >
> > Add bitmap.h and bitops.h to Dirty Bitmaps field.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zh...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  MAINTAINERS | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 56139ac8ab..360af3e8ca
> > 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -1773,6 +1773,8 @@ S: Supported
> >  F: util/hbitmap.c
> >  F: block/dirty-bitmap.c
> >  F: include/qemu/hbitmap.h
> > +F: include/qemu/bitmap.h
> > +F: include/qemu/bitops.h
> >  F: include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
> >  F: tests/test-hbitmap.c
> >  F: docs/interop/bitmaps.rst
> >
> 
> Actually, these bitmaps aren't the same kind as is used by the block storage
> module -- these are a more generic, primitive kind that I have no association
> with.

OK, but these two files are lack of maintenance.
Which maintenance area do you think these two files should belong to?


Thanks
Zhang Chen


Reply via email to