On 10.04.2011, at 22:08, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 10 April 2011 20:23, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote: >> On 10.04.2011, at 21:12, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> Now that PPC defaults to softfloat which always provides float128 >>> support, there is no need to keep two version of the code, depending if >>> float128 support is available or not. Suggested by Peter Maydell. > >> Looks good to me, but I'd leave this to Peter's ack. > > I think it's a sensible (and pretty straightforward) cleanup, yes. > [my bias towards emulation-accuracy means I don't really see > much place for softfloat-native in a tcg qemu target, so I have > no compunction about dropping support for it. :-)]
I'm fairly indifferent. The easier we can make the targets, the better IMHO. Of course, if we're dog slow and accurate that doesn't help too much either :). Alex
