On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 13:07, Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 23:11:00 +0000
> Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> wrote:
> > +    /* register system main memory (actual RAM) */
> > +    memory_region_init_ram(main_mem, NULL, "riscv.spike.ram",
> > +                           machine->ram_size, &error_fatal);
> do you really care about migration? if not then _nomigrate flavor would
> be more suitable.

Every machine model should care about migration, at least to
the extent of making savevm/loadvm snapshots work. Using
memory_region_init_ram_nomigrate() is a bad idea in new
code: it exists only for the benefit of older code which
is handling the migration of the backing RAM by hand for
migration-compatibility reasons.

> >      /* Initialize SOC */
> >      object_initialize_child(OBJECT(machine), "soc", &s->soc, 
> > sizeof(s->soc),
> >                              TYPE_RISCV_HART_ARRAY, &error_abort, NULL);
> > @@ -254,6 +343,12 @@ static void spike_v1_09_1_board_init(MachineState 
> > *machine)
> >      MemoryRegion *mask_rom = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> >      int i;
> >
> > +    if (!qtest_enabled()) {
> > +        info_report("The Spike v1.09.1 machine has been depreceated. "
> > +                    "Please use the deneric spike machine and specify the 
> > ISA "

"generic"

> > +                    "versions using -cpu.");
> > +    }
> > +

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to