On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 04/11/2011 08:15 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Markus Armbruster<arm...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> > Avi Kivity<a...@redhat.com> writes: >> > >> >> On 04/08/2011 12:41 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >>> >> >>> And it's a good thing to have, but exposing this as the only API to >> >>> do something as simple as generating a guest crash dump is not the >> >>> friendliest thing in the world to do to users. >> >> >> >> nmi is a fine name for something that corresponds to a real-life nmi >> >> button (often labeled "NMI"). >> > >> > Agree. >> >> We could also introduce an alias mechanism for user friendly names, so >> nmi could be used in addition of full path. Aliases could be useful >> for device paths as well. > > Yes. Perhaps limited to the human monitor.
I'd limit all debugging commands (including NMI) to the human monitor.
