On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 5:19 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi Mark, Artyom. > > On 5/5/19 12:46 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > > On 04/05/2019 22:02, Artyom Tarasenko wrote: > > > >> AIX 5.1 expects the base year to be 1900. Adjust accordingly. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4q...@gmail.com> > >> Reviewed-by: Hervé Poussineau <hpous...@reactos.org> > >> --- > >> hw/isa/i82378.c | 4 +++- > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/hw/isa/i82378.c b/hw/isa/i82378.c > >> index a5d67bc..546c928 100644 > >> --- a/hw/isa/i82378.c > >> +++ b/hw/isa/i82378.c > >> @@ -107,7 +107,9 @@ static void i82378_realize(PCIDevice *pci, Error > >> **errp) > >> isa = isa_create_simple(isabus, "i82374"); > >> > >> /* timer */ > >> - isa_create_simple(isabus, TYPE_MC146818_RTC); > >> + isa = isa_create(isabus, TYPE_MC146818_RTC); > >> + qdev_prop_set_int32(DEVICE(isa), "base_year", 1900); > >> + qdev_init_nofail(DEVICE(isa)); > >> } > >> > >> static void i82378_init(Object *obj) > > > > Is this true for the 82378 in general, or is it a particular quirk of the > > 40p > > machine/PReP specification? > > This is indeed incorrect (see > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-04/msg02452.html) so: > Nack > > Artyom: I did wrote the patch and included it in another series based on > top of Joel Stanley's > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg00657.html > which is also depending of another from Cédric, so I'll just extract it > and send directly, sorry for the delay.
Thanks, it works for me. -- Regards, Artyom Tarasenko SPARC and PPC PReP under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/search/label/qemu
