On 18/04/2019 20.13, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes: > >> On 18/04/2019 16.53, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> atoui() and get_index() pass char values to isdigit(). With a >>> standard isdigit(), we'd get undefined behavior when the value is >>> negative. But we're using isdigit() from pc-bios/s390-ccw/libc.h >>> here, which behaves nicely. Clean up anyway, just to avoid setting a >>> bad example. >>> >>> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> >>> Cc: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> >>> Cc: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> >>> Cc: qemu-s3...@nongnu.org >>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> pc-bios/s390-ccw/libc.c | 2 +- >>> pc-bios/s390-ccw/menu.c | 2 +- >>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/libc.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/libc.c >>> index a786566c4c..3187923950 100644 >>> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/libc.c >>> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/libc.c >>> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ uint64_t atoui(const char *str) >>> } >>> >>> while (*str) { >>> - if (!isdigit(*str)) { >>> + if (!isdigit(*(unsigned char *)str)) { >>> break; >>> } >>> val = val * 10 + *str - '0'; >>> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/menu.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/menu.c >>> index 82a4ae6315..ce3815b201 100644 >>> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/menu.c >>> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/menu.c >>> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static int get_index(void) >>> >>> /* Check for erroneous input */ >>> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { >>> - if (!isdigit(buf[i])) { >>> + if (!isdigit((unsigned char)buf[i])) { >>> return -1; >>> } >>> } >> >> FWIW, "char" is unsigned by default on s390x, so this is doing nothing. > > I see. > > If we decide to keep the patch, the commit message needs tweaking. > Perhaps: > > atoui() and get_index() pass char values to isdigit(). With a > standard isdigit(), we'd get undefined behavior when the value is > negative. Can't happen as char is unsigned on s390x. Even if it > could, we're actually using isdigit() from pc-bios/s390-ccw/libc.h > here, which works fine for negative values. Clean up anyway, just > to avoid setting a bad example.
Ok, I'll pick this up with the updated commit message. Thomas