On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 17:17, Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 5/10/19 9:01 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > Don't these need to be marked ARM_CP_IO for the benefit > > of -icount ? > > I don't think so. There's no lock taken, as for mmio devices. It's not not > related to time, virtual or otherwise. There are no possible exceptions. I > can't think of anything that would make icount care. > > Have I missed something?
If icount decides it needs to replay execution of the TB which the RNDR access is in, won't it get a different number back the second time it executes ? thanks -- PMM
