On 18 April 2011 22:00, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote:
> @@ -511,4 +530,11 @@ int floatx80_is_quiet_nan( floatx80 a1 )
> return ( ( u.i.high & 0x7FFF ) == 0x7FFF ) && (uint64_t) ( u.i.low<<1 );
> }
>
> +int floatx80_is_any_nan( floatx80 a1 )
> +{
> + floatx80u u;
> + u.f = a1;
> + return ((u.i.high & 0x7FFF) == 0x7FFF) && ( u.i.low<<1 );
> +}
> +
> #endif
As you can just see from the context, the new function is
actually identical to the existing floatx80_is_quiet_nan(),
but the latter is wrong, not this patch :-)
Nobody seems to use floatx80_is_quiet_nan() so if we're just
going to nuke softfloat-native shortly there's no point fixing
it I guess.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
-- PMM
