On 24.05.19 20:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 24.05.19 19:54, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> I'm having hard time to understand why the S390_IPL object calls
>> qemu_register_reset(qdev_reset_all_fn) in its realize() method, while
>> being QOM'ified (it has a reset method).
>>
>> It doesn't seem to have a qdev children added explicitly to it.
>> I see it is used as a singleton, what else am I missing?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Phil.
>>
>
> Looks like I added it back then (~4 years ago) when converting it into a
> TYPE_DEVICE.
>
> I could imagine that - back then - this was needed because only
> TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE would recursively get reset.
Yes, back then singleton devices were not recursively resetted. Has that
changed?
>
> Did you try removing it, to see if anything breaks?
>
