Stop using cpu_F0s for NEON_2RM_VRECPE_F and NEON_2RM_VRSQRTE_F. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> Message-id: 20190613163917.28589-8-peter.mayd...@linaro.org --- target/arm/translate.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/translate.c b/target/arm/translate.c index 124045a9ef6..75ed7cc7cb0 100644 --- a/target/arm/translate.c +++ b/target/arm/translate.c @@ -4181,7 +4181,7 @@ static int neon_2rm_is_float_op(int op) * what we are asking here is "does the code for this case in * the Neon for-each-pass loop use cpu_F0s?". */ - return op >= NEON_2RM_VRECPE_F; + return op >= NEON_2RM_VCVT_FS; } static bool neon_2rm_is_v8_op(int op) @@ -6848,14 +6848,14 @@ static int disas_neon_data_insn(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn) case NEON_2RM_VRECPE_F: { TCGv_ptr fpstatus = get_fpstatus_ptr(1); - gen_helper_recpe_f32(cpu_F0s, cpu_F0s, fpstatus); + gen_helper_recpe_f32(tmp, tmp, fpstatus); tcg_temp_free_ptr(fpstatus); break; } case NEON_2RM_VRSQRTE_F: { TCGv_ptr fpstatus = get_fpstatus_ptr(1); - gen_helper_rsqrte_f32(cpu_F0s, cpu_F0s, fpstatus); + gen_helper_rsqrte_f32(tmp, tmp, fpstatus); tcg_temp_free_ptr(fpstatus); break; } -- 2.20.1