From: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>

If a block node uses bdrv_child_try_set_perm() to change the permission
it takes on its child, the result may be very short-lived.  If anything
makes the block layer recalculate the permissions internally, it will
invoke the node driver's .bdrv_child_perm() implementation.  The
permission/shared permissions masks that returns will then override the
values previously passed to bdrv_child_try_set_perm().

If drivers want a child edge to have specific values for the
permissions/shared permissions mask, it must return them in
.bdrv_child_perm().  Consequentially, there is no need for them to pass
the same values to bdrv_child_try_set_perm() then: It is better to have
a function that invokes .bdrv_child_perm() and calls
bdrv_child_try_set_perm() with the result.  This patch adds such a
function under the name of bdrv_child_refresh_perms().

Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
---
 include/block/block_int.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
 block.c                   | 12 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/block/block_int.h b/include/block/block_int.h
index a498c2670b..d6415b53c1 100644
--- a/include/block/block_int.h
+++ b/include/block/block_int.h
@@ -1165,9 +1165,24 @@ BdrvChild *bdrv_root_attach_child(BlockDriverState 
*child_bs,
                                   void *opaque, Error **errp);
 void bdrv_root_unref_child(BdrvChild *child);
 
+/**
+ * Sets a BdrvChild's permissions.  Avoid if the parent is a BDS; use
+ * bdrv_child_refresh_perms() instead and make the parent's
+ * .bdrv_child_perm() implementation return the correct values.
+ */
 int bdrv_child_try_set_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
                             Error **errp);
 
+/**
+ * Calls bs->drv->bdrv_child_perm() and updates the child's permission
+ * masks with the result.
+ * Drivers should invoke this function whenever an event occurs that
+ * makes their .bdrv_child_perm() implementation return different
+ * values than before, but which will not result in the block layer
+ * automatically refreshing the permissions.
+ */
+int bdrv_child_refresh_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c, Error **errp);
+
 /* Default implementation for BlockDriver.bdrv_child_perm() that can be used by
  * block filters: Forward CONSISTENT_READ, WRITE, WRITE_UNCHANGED and RESIZE to
  * all children */
diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index ceb2ea23c5..013369851b 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -2083,6 +2083,18 @@ int bdrv_child_try_set_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm, 
uint64_t shared,
     return 0;
 }
 
+int bdrv_child_refresh_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c, Error **errp)
+{
+    uint64_t parent_perms, parent_shared;
+    uint64_t perms, shared;
+
+    bdrv_get_cumulative_perm(bs, &parent_perms, &parent_shared);
+    bdrv_child_perm(bs, c->bs, c, c->role, NULL, parent_perms, parent_shared,
+                    &perms, &shared);
+
+    return bdrv_child_try_set_perm(c, perms, shared, errp);
+}
+
 void bdrv_filter_default_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
                                const BdrvChildRole *role,
                                BlockReopenQueue *reopen_queue,
-- 
2.20.1


Reply via email to