On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 21:43 +0300, David Abdurachmanov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 9:18 PM Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 1:16 AM Andrea Bolognani <abolo...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > but one question comes to mind: once this is in, we will probably > > > want to have OpenSBI packaged separately in distributions, the same > > > way it already happens for SeaBIOS, SLOF and edk2-based firmwares. > > > > > > Will using either of the formats prevent that from happening? > > > > Both options allow this. > > > > OE-Core already packages OpenSBI by default, Fedora and Debian are > > moving to OpenSBI for RISC-V targets as well. > > > > Any distro that supports the RISC-V toolchain (which is all > > upstreamed) can build OpenSBI. > > Fedora uses OpenSBI for the last 2 or 3 months now. I don't plan to update > BBL builds. OpenSBI packages in Fedora/RISCV isn't finalized, but it does > ship *.elf and *.bin files.
Sounds good to me, thanks for confirming! -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
