The PMP check should be of the memory access size rather than TARGET_PAGE_SIZE.
Signed-off-by: Hesham Almatary <hesham.almat...@cl.cam.ac.uk> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> --- target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c index 00bc4f1712..64c12d83dc 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c @@ -417,8 +417,7 @@ bool riscv_cpu_tlb_fill(CPUState *cs, vaddr address, int size, if (riscv_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_PMP) && (ret == TRANSLATE_SUCCESS) && - !pmp_hart_has_privs(env, pa, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE, 1 << access_type, - mode)) { + !pmp_hart_has_privs(env, pa, size, 1 << access_type, mode)) { ret = TRANSLATE_PMP_FAIL; } if (ret == TRANSLATE_PMP_FAIL) { -- 2.17.1