On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 09:35:30PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 at 11:28, Mark Cave-Ayland > <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> wrote: > > > > On 06/07/2019 11:16, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > If you just do 'make' rather than 'make install' does it fail the same > > > way? > > > > Interesting. A quick test shows that "make V=1 -j2" works fine, it's just > > "make V=1 > > -j2 install" which is failing. > > Mmm. I suspect most people just do the plain make (with the make install > phase either never or as a second command afterwards), so missing-dependency > bugs between the install targets and the build targets are probably more > likely to lurk around. We should stil fix them, though, assuming we > can track them down...
The main 'install' target depends on 'all': install: all $(if $(BUILD_DOCS),install-doc) install-datadir install-localstatedir \ but I think still allows 'install-doc', 'install-datadir' and 'install-localstatedir' to parallelize wrt 'all'. I guess the fix is to make each of those 'install-xxx' targets depend on 'all' instead. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
