On 15.07.19 17:02, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 15/07/2019 16.23, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> David suggested to keep everything in sync as 4.1 is not yet released.
>> This patch fixes the name "vxbeh" into "vxp".
>>
>> To simplify the backports this patch will not change VECTOR_BCD_ENH as
>> this is just an internal name. That will be done by an extra patch that
>> does not need to be backported.
>>
>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
>> Fixes: d05be57ddc2e ("s390: cpumodel: fix description for the new vector
>> facility")
>> Fixes: 54d65de0b525 ("s390x/cpumodel: vector enhancements")
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
>> b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
>> index 3118a9f89228..99f58a89318a 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.inc.h
>> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ DEF_FEAT(CMM_NT, "cmmnt", STFL, 147, "CMM:
>> ESSA-enhancement (no translate) facil
>> DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_ENH2, "vxeh2", STFL, 148, "Vector Enhancements facility 2")
>> DEF_FEAT(ESORT_BASE, "esort-base", STFL, 150, "Enhanced-sort facility
>> (excluding subfunctions)")
>> DEF_FEAT(DEFLATE_BASE, "deflate-base", STFL, 151, "Deflate-conversion
>> facility (excluding subfunctions)")
>> -DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_BCD_ENH, "vxbeh", STFL, 152,
>> "Vector-Packed-Decimal-Enhancement Facility")
>> +DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_BCD_ENH, "vxp", STFL, 152,
>> "Vector-Packed-Decimal-Enhancement Facility")
>
> We already have:
>
> DEF_FEAT(VECTOR_PACKED_DECIMAL, "vxpd", STFL, 134, "Vector packed decimal
> facility")
>
> ... so I rather expected something like "vxpde" here instead? Or is there a
> reason
>
for just using "vxp"?
Matching what the Linux kernel has.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/arch/s390/kernel/processor.c?id=a8fd61688dfad6fdce95fa64cacd8a66595697b8
>
> Thomas
>
