On 21/07/19 12:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 10:58:42AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 03.06.19 02:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 01:42:13PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
>>>>
>>>> Masked entries will not generate interrupt messages, thus do no need to
>>>> be routed by KVM. This is a cosmetic cleanup, just avoiding warnings of
>>>> the kind
>>>>
>>>> qemu-system-x86_64: vtd_irte_get: detected non-present IRTE (index=0, 
>>>> high=0xff00, low=0x100)
>>>>
>>>> if the masked entry happens to reference a non-present IRTE.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>  hw/intc/ioapic.c | 8 +++++---
>>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/intc/ioapic.c b/hw/intc/ioapic.c
>>>> index 7074489fdf..2fb288a22d 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/intc/ioapic.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/intc/ioapic.c
>>>> @@ -197,9 +197,11 @@ static void 
>>>> ioapic_update_kvm_routes(IOAPICCommonState *s)
>>>>              MSIMessage msg;
>>>>              struct ioapic_entry_info info;
>>>>              ioapic_entry_parse(s->ioredtbl[i], &info);
>>>> -            msg.address = info.addr;
>>>> -            msg.data = info.data;
>>>> -            kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(kvm_state, i, msg, NULL);
>>>> +            if (!info.masked) {
>>>> +                msg.address = info.addr;
>>>> +                msg.data = info.data;
>>>> +                kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(kvm_state, i, msg, NULL);
>>>> +            }
>>>>          }
>>>>          kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(kvm_state);
>>>>      }
>>>> --
>>>> 2.16.4
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ping. Or is this queued for 4.2?
>>
>> Jan
> 
> Paolo was queueing ioapic things recently. I can take this if
> he doesn't respond until I pack up my next pull req.
> 

I've already sent a pull request and had missed this patch, so please go
ahead.

Paolo

Reply via email to