On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 11:39, Aleksandar Markovic <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, according to out docs, here is the procedure that should produce > coverage report for execution of the complete "make check": > > #./configure --enable-gcov > #make > #make check > #make coverage-report > > It seems that first three commands execute as expected. (For example, there > are plenty of files generated by "make check" that would've not been > generated if "enable-gcov" hadn't been chosen.) However, the last command > complains about some missing files related to FP support. If those files are > added (for example, artificially, using "touch <missing-file"), that it > starts complaining about missing some decodetree-generated files. Other kinds > of files are involved too. > > It would be nice to have coverage support working. Please somebody take a > look, or explain if I make a mistake or misunderstood our gcov support.
Cc'ing Alex who's probably the closest we have to a gcov expert. (make/make check of a --enable-gcov build is in the set of things our Travis CI setup runs, so we do defend that part against regressions.) thanks -- PMM
