21.08.2019. 23.00, "Eduardo Habkost" <ehabk...@redhat.com> је написао/ла: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:27:11PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: > > 02.08.2019. 17.37, "Aleksandar Markovic" <aleksandar.marko...@rt-rk.com> је > > написао/ла: > > > > > > From: Aleksandar Markovic <amarko...@wavecomp.com> > > > > > > This little series improves linux_ssh_mips_malta.py, both in the sense > > > of code organization and in the sense of quantity of executed tests. > > > > > > > Hello, all. > > > > I am going to send a new version in few days, and I have a question for > > test team: > > > > Currently, the outcome of the script execition is either PASS:1 FAIL:0 or > > PASS:0 FAIL:1. But the test actually consists of several subtests. Is there > > any way that this single Python script considers these subtests as separate > > tests (test cases), reporting something like PASS:12 FAIL:7? If yes, what > > would be the best way to achieve that? > > If you are talking about each test_*() method, they are already > treated like separate tests. If you mean treating each > ssh_command_output_contains() call as a separate test, this might > be difficult. >
Yes, I meant the latter one, individual code segments involving an invocation of ssh_command_output_contains() instance being treated as separate tests. > Cleber, is there something already available in the Avocado API > that would help us report more fine-grained results inside each > test case? > Thanks, that would be a better way of expressing my question. > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Aleksandar > > > > > Aleksandar Markovic (2): > > > tests/acceptance: Refactor and improve reporting in > > > linux_ssh_mips_malta.py > > > tests/acceptance: Add new test cases in linux_ssh_mips_malta.py > > > > > > tests/acceptance/linux_ssh_mips_malta.py | 81 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > > > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.7.4 > > > > > > > > -- > Eduardo
