On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 08:12:51PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 14.08.19 22:22, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > While there are other places where these are still stored in memory,
> > this is still one less key material area that can be sniffed with
> > various side channel attacks
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> (Many empty lines here)
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevi...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  crypto/block-luks.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> Wouldn’t it make sense to introduce a dedicated function for this?

Yes, it would.

In fact I have a series pending which bumps min glib and introduces
use of auto-free functions in this code.

It would be desirable to have a autp-free func for memset+free
so we can just declare the variable

   q_autowipefree char *password = NULL;

and have it result in memset+free

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

Reply via email to