On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 08:31 -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 8/25/19 11:08 AM, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > > > I'd do a separate check for stripes and active fields, and then give a > > > > specific error message for each. That way if this does ever trigger > > > > in practice will immediately understand which check failed. > > > > > > > > Also using '%d' rather than '%i' is more common convention > > > > > > Done. > > > > Note that I switched i,j to be size_t since you said that you prefer this, > > and to print this I apparently need %lu. > > Actually, for size_t, you need %zu. %lu/size_t will cause warnings on > 32-bit platforms. > > Thank you! I have read something like that on the internet, but I wondered, what actually is the most portable way.
Best regards, Maxim Levitsky