On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:13 AM Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 09:35 +0200, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 05:14:36PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 17:03 +0200, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > I'm suggesting this because it seems like a cleaner approach than > > exposing the calendar concept to the vhost-user devices. > > As I argue above, for all intents and purposes that only works for > extremely trivial devices, to the extent that I'd rather exclude them > than risk unexpected behaviour.
That makes sense, I think a vhost-user protocol extension is necessary here. Thanks for explaining. Stefan
