On 9/18/19 5:26 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:36:20 +0200 > Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:24:12 +0200 >> Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:21:34 +0200 >>> Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Ensure that hints are added even if errp is &error_fatal or &error_abort. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org> >>>> --- >>>> hw/s390x/s390-ccw.c | 6 ++++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> >>> >>> Can also take this via the s390 tree, let me know what would work best. >> >> I guess it would be easier to merge if each individual patch goes >> through the corresponding sub-maintainer tree. But Eric mentioned >> in another mail that the whole whole series could maybe go through >> Markus' error tree... so, I don't know which is best. :) > > Ok, it's probably best to take this through the s390 tree, as I plan to > send a pull request tomorrow :)
If we go with Vladimir's idea of auto-propagation, this change just gets rewritten again as part of our simplifications to drop all use of 'local_err' in favor of instead using the macro that makes errp always safe to use locally. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
