On 05/20/2011 06:59 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> Jan had mentioned previously about registering a new temporary window.
> I assume the registration always gets highest_priority++, or do you have
> to explicitly specify that PCI container gets priority=1?
The latter.
And I really prefer to have this explicit over deriving the priority
from the registration order. That's way too fragile/unhandy. If you
decide to replace a region of lower priority later on, you need to
reregister everything at that level.
Exactly.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
