Hi Philippe, I've checked and yes, I can make time to review patches. This is part of my current paid work, so when my contract eventually ends I will likely have to step down as reviewer. I'll have notice of that happening some time before, so I can pass that along when it comes.
This message comes from my work email so the details should be correct, i.e. Sarah Harris <s.e.har...@kent.ac.uk> Kind regards, Sarah Harris On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 09:31:07 +0200 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Sarah, > > On 5/10/19 1:17 PM, Sarah Harris wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > > Having discussed with my colleagues, we don't have the resources to > > maintain this. > > If you wanted to take up Michael's offer then I'm happy to respond to > > queries and provide minor fixes. > > Otherwise, we will make our repository publicly available in the near > > future for anyone who wants to use it. > > Would you agree to be listed as reviewer for AVR (Michael being the > maintainer)? > > M: Mail patches to: FullName <address@domain> > Maintainers are looking after a certain area and must be CCed on > patches. They are considered the main contact point. > R: Designated reviewer: FullName <address@domain> > These reviewers should be CCed on patches. > Reviewers are familiar with the subject matter and provide feedback > even though they are not maintainers. > > > Kind regards, > > Sarah Harris > > > > On Sun, 5 May 2019 09:10:00 -0700 > > Michael Rolnik <mrol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Richard. > >> > >> I can maintain it > >> > >> Sent from my cell phone, please ignore typos > >> > >> On Sun, May 5, 2019, 8:57 AM Richard Henderson > >> <richard.hender...@linaro.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On 5/4/19 1:36 AM, Sarah Harris wrote: > >>>> Signed-off-by: Sarah Harris <s.e.har...@kent.ac.uk> > >>> ... > >>>> > >>>> +AVR > >>>> +M: Michael Rolnik <mrol...@gmail.com> > >>>> +S: Odd Fixes > >>>> +F: target-avr/ > >>>> +F: hw/avr/ > >>>> + > >>> > >>> This is not how things work. Michael wasn't up to maintaining the code 2 > >>> years > >>> ago; that's why it was never committed. > >>> > >>> You would need to maintain this yourself, and for more than "Odd Fixes". > >>> > >>> > >>> r~ > >>> > > >