On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 00:01, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> > ---
> hw/arm/virt.c | 2 +- I think from a quick code scan that this is ok, but did you test that migration compat from old to new still works? I vaguely recall that there are some cases when adding an owner to a memory region changes the name string used for identifying the ramblock in migration. thanks -- PMM
