Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 22/10/2019 15.48, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> writes: >> >>> On 22.10.19 15:11, Alex Bennée wrote: >>>> >>>> Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> As discussed here: >>>>> >>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg00697.html >>>>> >>>>> and here: >>>>> >>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01388.html >>>> >>>> Queued to testing/next, thanks. >>> >>> It should be noted that this series depends on my SOCK_DIR series (which >>> I have in my block branch), or the newly added tests are likely to fail >>> in the CI environment. >> >> Ahh I misread.... >> <snip> >> >>>>> it would be good to have some more valuable iotests enabled in the >>>>> "auto" group to get better iotest coverage during "make check". >>>>> >>>>> And once Max' "iotests: Add and use $SOCK_DIR" patch series has been >>>>> merged, we can indeed enable these Python-based tests, too. >> >> I though these weren't enabled in this series. Do I need to drop all the >> patches? > > I think it's better if the iotest patches go through Max' or Kevin's > block tree. OK I can drop them from my tree. > > Thomas -- Alex Bennée
