On 10/11/19 9:01 AM, Klaus Jensen wrote:
Some might actually care about the return value of dma_memory_rw. So let us pass it along instead of ignoring it.Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jen...@samsung.com> --- include/hw/pci/pci.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h index f3f0ffd5fb78..4e95bb847857 100644 --- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h @@ -779,8 +779,7 @@ static inline AddressSpace *pci_get_address_space(PCIDevice *dev) static inline int pci_dma_rw(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr, void *buf, dma_addr_t len, DMADirection dir) { - dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir); - return 0; + return dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir); }static inline int pci_dma_read(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
