Am 26.05.2011 23:48, schrieb Andreas Färber:
Am 26.05.2011 um 00:17 schrieb Alexander Graf:
On 26.05.2011, at 00:10, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 25 May 2011 21:25, Stefan Weil <w...@mail.berlios.de> wrote:
Feel free to combine patches if larger patches are preferred.
I'd vote for combining at least 03..12, having nine patches all
of which have the same summary line is a bit confusing :-)
I actually like them as individual patches. Makes bisecting a lot
easier :).
Stefan, could you add the function name or some other discriminator to
the subject then, please?
Andreas
This would result in these subjects:
4 x target-s390x: Add missing tcg_temp_free_i64() in disas_a5
2 x target-s390x: Add missing tcg_temp_free_i64() in disas_s390_insn
1 x target-s390x: Add missing tcg_temp_free_i64() in disas_b2
1 x target-s390x: Add missing tcg_temp_free_i64() in do_mh
1 x target-s390x: Add missing tcg_temp_free_i64() in gen_jcc
So there remain duplicate subjects. Adding the line number or a sequence
number
would look somehow strange.
The subjects are identical simply because the changes are very similar.
If needed, git provides the unique identification.
Maybe combining the patches which share the same function and add
this function name to the subject would be a compromise which still
allows bisecting.
Cheers,
Stefan
