Blue Swirl writes: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Lluís <xscr...@gmx.net> wrote: >> Nicely handling per-arch functions would be one of the benefits of using >> C++ in QEMU (I know, it's sufficient but not necessary). What were the >> conclusions regarding such a change?
> I don't think the discussions gave enough motivation for the change. > There's resistance to qdevification already and that is far from a > real object model. Well, C++ templates would help clean the current define and macro-based code generation labyrinth without switching the whole QEMU codebase into an OO design, but I suppose this was also part of the duscussion. Thanks, Lluis -- "And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn something new, the whole world becomes that much richer." -- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in The Phantom Tollbooth
