On Fri, 27 May 2011 20:27:11 +0200, Stefan Weil <w...@mail.berlios.de> wrote: > Am 29.04.2011 02:46, schrieb Peter Maydell: > > On 28 April 2011 21:49, Anthony Liguori<anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: > > > >> On 04/28/2011 03:02 PM, Stefan Weil wrote: > >> > >>> -$(addprefix 9pfs/, $(9pfs-nested-y)): CFLAGS += -I$(SRC_PATH)/hw/ > >>> > >> Wouldn't it be more straight forward to just do QEMU_CFLAGS +=? > >> > > There aren't any other source files in QEMU which have custom > > include paths -- why should 9pfs be a special case? > > > > -- PMM > > > > Was this an acked-by? > The patch is still uncommitted. Are there any objections?
I have pulled this patch into the tree. I guess the next pull request from JV should include that. -aneesh
