Hi, On 28 May 2011 21:52, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Marcus Comstedt <mar...@mc.pp.se> wrote: >> After NACKing a read operation, a raising SCL should not trigger a new >> read from the slave. Introduce a new state which just waits for a stop >> or start condition after NACK.
Makes sense, I pushed this change to master. Cheers
