On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 19:32, Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.m.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > [a] Is there any particular reason that you picked DS3231 ? Linux kernel > > has drivers for DS3232/34 only [1]. I did read the datasheets of both > > 3232 & 3231 and found that they are quite similar except for the 236 > > bytes of SRAM support found only in 3232. > > > > Yes, DS3231 is a part of a board we want to support in future.
We should probably prefer to go with a device that's a missing part of a board we already support -- generally the project prefers not to take device models that don't have a use, ie they go in with the board model rather than before. This also means we have some way of testing the code :-) thanks -- PMM