On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:42:35 +0100 Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 2019-11-14 14:19, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:02:35 +0100 > > Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:38:23 +0100 > >> Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 20:02:33 +0100 > >>> Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > >>> > ...snip... > >> We made some different design decisions, while aiming essentially for the > >> same. Maybe it's due to different scope, maybe not. For instance one > >> can't test IDA with PONG, I guess. > > Now that I saw this again, I also recall the discussion of comparing it > > with the "testdev" for pci/isa. Anybody knows if these are used by > > kvm-unit-tests? > > Only by X. If they use it, it might make sense for s390 to use a comparable approach. Btw, I created https://wiki.qemu.org/Testing/CCWTestDevice back then; might make sense to collect ideas there? > > Regards, > > Pierre > >
