On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 10:47, David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
> My personal opinion: "max" really means "all features". If we want an
> automatic way to specify something you requested ("give me something
> that's going to work") we either have to change the definition of the
> max model for alla rchitectures or introduce something that really
> matches the "no -cpu specified" - e.g., "best".I don't strongly object to 'max' including deprecated features, but I do definitely object to 'max' including by default any experimental (x- prefix) features. Those should never be enabled (whatever the '-cpu foo' name) unless the user has specifically opted into them: that's the point of the x- prefix. We need to be able to tell from the command line whether it's got any non-standard weirdness enabled. thanks -- PMM
