On 06.11.2019 15:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:34:34AM +0000, Denis Lunev wrote:
>> On 10/24/19 12:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>>>> From: "Denis V. Lunev" <d...@openvz.org>
>>>>
>>>> Linux guests submit IO requests no longer than PAGE_SIZE * max_seg
>>>> field reported by SCSI controler. Thus typical sequential read with
>>>> 1 MB size results in the following pattern of the IO from the guest:
>>>> 8,16 1 15754 2.766095122 2071 D R 2095104 + 1008 [dd]
>>>> 8,16 1 15755 2.766108785 2071 D R 2096112 + 1008 [dd]
>>>> 8,16 1 15756 2.766113486 2071 D R 2097120 + 32 [dd]
>>>> 8,16 1 15757 2.767668961 0 C R 2095104 + 1008 [0]
>>>> 8,16 1 15758 2.768534315 0 C R 2096112 + 1008 [0]
>>>> 8,16 1 15759 2.768539782 0 C R 2097120 + 32 [0]
>>>> The IO was generated by
>>>> dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1024 iflag=direct
>>>>
>>>> This effectively means that on rotational disks we will observe 3 IOPS
>>>> for each 2 MBs processed. This definitely negatively affects both
>>>> guest and host IO performance.
>>>>
>>>> The cure is relatively simple - we should report lengthy scatter-gather
>>>> ability of the SCSI controller. Fortunately the situation here is very
>>>> good. VirtIO transport layer can accomodate 1024 items in one request
>>>> while we are using only 128. This situation is present since almost
>>>> very beginning. 2 items are dedicated for request metadata thus we
>>>> should publish VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE - 2 as max_seg.
>>>>
>>>> The following pattern is observed after the patch:
>>>> 8,16 1 9921 2.662721340 2063 D R 2095104 + 1024 [dd]
>>>> 8,16 1 9922 2.662737585 2063 D R 2096128 + 1024 [dd]
>>>> 8,16 1 9923 2.665188167 0 C R 2095104 + 1024 [0]
>>>> 8,16 1 9924 2.665198777 0 C R 2096128 + 1024 [0]
>>>> which is much better.
>>>>
>>>> The dark side of this patch is that we are tweaking guest visible
>>>> parameter, though this should be relatively safe as above transport
>>>> layer support is present in QEMU/host Linux for a very long time.
>>>> The patch adds configurable property for VirtIO SCSI with a new default
>>>> and hardcode option for VirtBlock which does not provide good
>>>> configurable framework.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately the commit can not be applied as is. For the real cure we
>>>> need guest to be fixed to accomodate that queue length, which is done
>>>> only in the latest 4.14 kernel. Thus we are going to expose the property
>>>> and tweak it on machine type level.
>>>>
>>>> The problem with the old kernels is that they have
>>>> max_segments <= virtqueue_size restriction which cause the guest
>>>> crashing in the case of violation.
>>> This isn't just in the guests: virtio spec also seems to imply this,
>>> or at least be vague on this point.
>>>
>>> So I think it'll need a feature bit.
>>> Doing that in a safe way will also allow being compatible with old guests.
>>>
>>> The only downside is it's a bit more work as we need to
>>> spec this out and add guest support.
>>>
>>>> To fix the case described above in the old kernels we can increase
>>>> virtqueue_size to 256 and max_segments to 254. The pitfall here is
>>>> that seabios allows the virtqueue_size-s < 128, however, the seabios
>>>> patch extending that value to 256 is pending.
>>> And the fix here is just to limit large vq size to virtio 1.0.
>>> In that mode it's fine I think:
>>>
>>>
>>> /* check if the queue is available */
>>> if (vp->use_modern) {
>>> num = vp_read(&vp->common, virtio_pci_common_cfg, queue_size);
>>> if (num > MAX_QUEUE_NUM) {
>>> vp_write(&vp->common, virtio_pci_common_cfg, queue_size,
>>> MAX_QUEUE_NUM);
>>> num = vp_read(&vp->common, virtio_pci_common_cfg, queue_size);
>>> }
>>> } else {
>>> num = vp_read(&vp->legacy, virtio_pci_legacy, queue_num);
>>> }
The same seabios snippet, but more detailed:
vp_find_vq()
{
...
/* check if the queue is available */
if (vp->use_modern) {
num = vp_read(&vp->common, virtio_pci_common_cfg, queue_size);
if (num > MAX_QUEUE_NUM) {
vp_write(&vp->common, virtio_pci_common_cfg, queue_size,
MAX_QUEUE_NUM);
num = vp_read(&vp->common, virtio_pci_common_cfg, queue_size);
}
} else {
num = vp_read(&vp->legacy, virtio_pci_legacy, queue_num);
}
if (!num) {
dprintf(1, "ERROR: queue size is 0\n");
goto fail;
}
if (num > MAX_QUEUE_NUM) {
dprintf(1, "ERROR: queue size %d > %d\n", num, MAX_QUEUE_NUM);
goto fail;
}
...
}
It turned out that the problem is here, but not because of the seabios code.
The virtqueue size is written and then incorrect value is re-read.
Thanks to Roman Kagan (rka...@virtuozzo.com) for investigating the root
cause of the problem.
As the code states, for the modern devices, seabios reads the queue size
and if it's
greater than seabios can support, reduce the queue size to the max
seabios supported value.
This doesn't work.
The reason is that the size is read from the virtio device,
virtio_pci_common_read()
{
...
case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SIZE:
val = virtio_queue_get_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel);
break;
...
}
but is written to the proxy
virtio_pci_common_write()
{
...
case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_SIZE:
proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].num = val;
break;
...
}.
The final stage of the size setting is propagated it from the proxy to
the device on virtqueue enabling:
virtio_cpi_common_write()
{
...
case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE:
virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel,
proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].num);
virtio_queue_set_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel,
((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[1]) << 32 |
proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[0],
((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].avail[1]) << 32 |
proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].avail[0],
((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[1]) << 32 |
proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[0]);
proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].enabled = 1;
break;
...
}.
So we have the following workflow:
suppose the device has virtqueue size = 256 and seabios MAX_QUEUE_NUM = 128.
In that case the seabios works like:
1. if vp_modern read the size (256)
2. 256 > 128
3. write virtqueue size = 128
4. re-read virtqueue size = 256 !!!
5. fail because of the check
if (num > MAX_QUEUE_NUM) {
dprintf(1, "ERROR: queue size %d > %d\n", num, MAX_QUEUE_NUM);
goto fail;
}
To fix the issue, we need to read and write the virtqueue size from the
same place.
Should we do with the proxy?
Is there any reason to read from the device and write to the proxy?
Furthermore, the size setting has a few flaws:
1. The size being set should be a power of 2
2. The size being set should be less or equal to the virtqueue size (and
be greater that 2?)
Denis
>> you mean to put the code like this into virtio_pci_realize() inside QEMU?
>>
>> If no, can you pls clarify which component should be touched.
>>
>> Den
> I mean:
> - add an API to change the default queue size
> - add a validate features callback, in there check and for modern
> flag set in features increase the queue size
>
> maybe all this is too much work, we could block this
> for transitional devices, but your patch does not do it,
> you need to check that legacy is enabled not that modern
> is not disabled.
>
>
>
