Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.m.m...@gmail.com> writes: > I read LICENSE file, but I read also recent contributions, and it is > not clear to me what version of GPL is best/recommended for new file > just being introduced to QEMU:
The situation is confusing. It's a mess of our own making. > * GPL 2.0 > * GPL 2.0 (or later at your option) > * GPL 2.1 > * GPL 2.1 (or later at your option) > > or something else. (The rest od wording of license preamble is clear > to me.) Please somebody explsin snd clarify. Let's not add to the mess: GPLv2+ unless you have a compelling reason to deviate, spelled out in your commit message. In my opinion, accepting GPLv2-only contributions was a mistake.
