On 28.11.19 16:05, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 12:48, Christian Borntraeger
> <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28.11.19 13:45, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:35:29 +0100
>>> Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ack.
>>>>
>>>> Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a
>>>> bios rebuild)
>>>> as this fixes a regression. Opinions?
>>>
>>> I fear that this is a bit late for 4.2... but this should get a
>>> cc:stable.
>>
>> So we would rather ship a qemu regression instead of pushing a 1 line fixup?
>> Peter, what is the current state of 4.2? does it look like we will have an
>> rc4
>> or is everything else silent.
>
> There isn't currently anything else that would need an rc4.
I would vote for getting this patch still in. And I think we probably do not
need an
rc4 for that, the fix seems pretty straight forward.
