On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 9:46 PM Felipe Franciosi <fel...@nutanix.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, ich9_lpc_initfn simply serves as a caller to
> ich9_lpc_add_properties. This simplifies the code a bit by eliminating
> ich9_lpc_add_properties altogether and executing its logic in the parent
> object initialiser function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Franciosi <fel...@nutanix.com>

Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>

> ---
>  hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 15 +++++----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> index 9f4e00dddd..c40bb3c420 100644
> --- a/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> +++ b/hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c
> @@ -634,12 +634,14 @@ static void ich9_lpc_get_sci_int(Object *obj, Visitor 
> *v, const char *name,
>      visit_type_uint8(v, name, &lpc->sci_gsi, errp);
>  }
>
> -static void ich9_lpc_add_properties(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
> +static void ich9_lpc_initfn(Object *obj)
>  {
> +    ICH9LPCState *lpc = ICH9_LPC_DEVICE(obj);
> +
>      static const uint8_t acpi_enable_cmd = ICH9_APM_ACPI_ENABLE;
>      static const uint8_t acpi_disable_cmd = ICH9_APM_ACPI_DISABLE;
>
> -    object_property_add(OBJECT(lpc), ACPI_PM_PROP_SCI_INT, "uint8",
> +    object_property_add(obj, ACPI_PM_PROP_SCI_INT, "uint8",
>                          ich9_lpc_get_sci_int,
>                          NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
>      object_property_add_uint8_ptr(OBJECT(lpc), ACPI_PM_PROP_ACPI_ENABLE_CMD,
> @@ -647,14 +649,7 @@ static void ich9_lpc_add_properties(ICH9LPCState *lpc)
>      object_property_add_uint8_ptr(OBJECT(lpc), ACPI_PM_PROP_ACPI_DISABLE_CMD,
>                                    &acpi_disable_cmd, OBJ_PROP_FLAG_READ, 
> NULL);
>
> -    ich9_pm_add_properties(OBJECT(lpc), &lpc->pm, NULL);
> -}
> -
> -static void ich9_lpc_initfn(Object *obj)
> -{
> -    ICH9LPCState *lpc = ICH9_LPC_DEVICE(obj);
> -
> -    ich9_lpc_add_properties(lpc);
> +    ich9_pm_add_properties(obj, &lpc->pm, NULL);
>  }
>
>  static void ich9_lpc_realize(PCIDevice *d, Error **errp)
> --
> 2.20.1
>


-- 
Marc-André Lureau

Reply via email to