On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 17:08 +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > I don't have a strong enough opinion about kvm-adjvtime vs. > kvm-no-adjvtime to insist one way or another. I agree double inversions > are easier to mess up, but I also like the way the '-no-' better > communicates that the default is [probably] 'yes'. > > All interested parties, please vote. I'll be sending v2 soon and I can > call this thing anything the majority (or the dominate minority) prefer.
I like kvm-adjvtime better because it avoids the double negative, but on the other hand if the new default is be to adjust the time then I don't expect many people will actually need to use the parameter, so the name doesn't matter that much after all :) -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
