Dear David Gibson,

I know you are under no obligation to respond, but if it's possible for you
to find the time to respond to my question, I would be extremely grateful.
My team at Boeing has been stuck trying to get KVM working for our project
for the last few months.  A good explanation of why this isn't possible
would be absolutely critical.

-Thanks, Wayne Li

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 1:17 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12/12/19 02:59, Wayne Li wrote:
> > We wrote a project that is created on top of the QEMU source code; it
> > calls functions from the QEMU code.  I run the executable created by
> > compiling that project/QEMU code.  Anyway, looking at the following
> > documentation:
> >
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/powerpc/cpu_families.txt
> >
> > It looks like the PowerPC 7457 is Book3S and the PowerPC e6500 is
> > BookE.  Is that why you think I require a Book3S KVM?  Exactly why do
> > you feel this way?  Also would that mean my team would need to go and
> > buy a board with a Book3S processor?
>
> CCing the PPC maintainer.  There are aspects of BookE and Book3S that
> are different and not really interchangeable in the privileged interface.
>
> Paolo
>
> > -Thanks!, Wayne Li
> >
> > From my understanding
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 7:16 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com
> > <mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 11/12/19 22:23, Wayne Li wrote:
> >     >
> >     > Now I am fairly sure KVM is actually enabled on the system.
> Finding
> >     > that out was another story that spanned a couple of months.  But
> long
> >     > story short, lsmod doesn't show that the KVM kernel module is
> >     running.
> >     > But that's because KVM is built-in and it can't actually be built
> as a
> >     > loadable kernel module in this particular system.
> >     >
> >     > So I'm not really sure what could be the problem.  Though I was
> >     thinking
> >     > if I understood the error better that might help?  Following the
> >     code I
> >     > see that the "Missing PVR setting capability." is called when a
> >     variable
> >     > called "cap_segstate" is 0:
> >     >
> >     > if (!cap_segstate) {
> >     >             fprintf(stderr, "kvm error: missing PVR setting
> >     capability\n");
> >     >             return -ENOSYS;
> >     > }
> >     >
> >     > And the cap_segstate variable is set by the following function:
> >     >
> >     > cap_segstate = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PPC_SEGSTATE);
> >
> >     You are not saying how you are running QEMU.  I think you are using a
> >     CPU model that requires a Book3S KVM.
> >
> >     Paolo
> >
>
>

Reply via email to