Would this one be picked up this time? On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 07:19:58AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >We don't support multifd during postcopy, but user still could enable >both multifd and postcopy. This leads to migration failure. > >Patch 1 does proper cleanup, otherwise we may have data corruption. >Patch 2 does the main job. > >BTW, current multifd synchronization method needs a cleanup. Will send another >patch set. > >Wei Yang (2): > migration/multifd: clean pages after filling packet > migration/multifd: not use multifd during postcopy > > migration/ram.c | 15 ++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >-- >2.17.1
-- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
