The nvme device needs to know the return value of dma_memory_rw to pass block/011 from blktests. So pass it along instead of ignoring it.
There are no existing users of the return value, so this patch should be safe. Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jen...@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> --- include/hw/pci/pci.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h index db75c6dfd05e..4d6f2b48a7f7 100644 --- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h @@ -783,8 +783,7 @@ static inline AddressSpace *pci_get_address_space(PCIDevice *dev) static inline int pci_dma_rw(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr, void *buf, dma_addr_t len, DMADirection dir) { - dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir); - return 0; + return dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir); } static inline int pci_dma_read(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr, -- 2.24.1