The nvme device needs to know the return value of dma_memory_rw to pass
block/011 from blktests. So pass it along instead of ignoring it.

There are no existing users of the return value, so this patch should be
safe.

Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jen...@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
---
 include/hw/pci/pci.h | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
index db75c6dfd05e..4d6f2b48a7f7 100644
--- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h
+++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
@@ -783,8 +783,7 @@ static inline AddressSpace *pci_get_address_space(PCIDevice 
*dev)
 static inline int pci_dma_rw(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
                              void *buf, dma_addr_t len, DMADirection dir)
 {
-    dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir);
-    return 0;
+    return dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir);
 }
 
 static inline int pci_dma_read(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
-- 
2.24.1


Reply via email to