Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 06/07/2011 09:51 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> > diff --git a/hw/spapr_vio.c b/hw/spapr_vio.c
>>> > index 6f34159..a193caa 100644
>>> > --- a/hw/spapr_vio.c
>>> > +++ b/hw/spapr_vio.c
>>> > @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@
>>> > static struct BusInfo spapr_vio_bus_info = {
>>> > .name = "spapr-vio",
>>> > .size = sizeof(VIOsPAPRBus),
>>> > + .props = (Property[]) {
>>> > + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("irq", VIOsPAPRDevice, vio_irq_num, 0), \
>>> > + DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>>> > + },
>>> > };
>>
>> Out of this patch's scope, but I need to ask anyway: do devices on a
>> spapr-vio bus have a unique address? If yes, what is it?
>
> That would be the "reg" value in DEFINE_SPAPR_PROPERTIES (patch 2). I
> didn't make it a bus property because the default values varies
> according to the device type.
Hmm. Explain that in a comment where the bus property would go?
>> Is it okay to share interrupts?
>
> Seems to work. :)
Fair enough.
