On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:32:42 +0100 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 28/12/19 11:43, Xiaoyao Li wrote: > > Commit 11bc4a13d1f4 ("kvm: convert "-machine kernel_irqchip" to an > > accelerator property") moves kernel_irqchip property from "-machine" to > > "-accel kvm", but it forgets to set the default value of > > kernel_irqchip_allowed and kernel_irqchip_split. > > > > Also cleaning up the three useless members (kernel_irqchip_allowed, > > kernel_irqchip_required, kernel_irqchip_split) in struct MachineState. FWIW, this also fixes s390x, which requires kernel_irqchip=on. > > > > Fixes: 11bc4a13d1f4 ("kvm: convert "-machine kernel_irqchip" to an > > accelerator property") > > Reported-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao...@intel.com> > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - Add Reported-by tag; > > - Initialize kernel_irqchip_split in init_machine(); > > Now that I am actually reviewing the patch on something other than a > phone, I think this would break "-machine kernel_irqchip=split". I'll > test, and squash if it works, something like this: > > diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c > index afbbe0a1af..ea35433170 100644 > --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c > +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct KVMState > int kvm_shadow_mem; > bool kernel_irqchip_allowed; > bool kernel_irqchip_required; > - bool kernel_irqchip_split; > + OnOffAuto kernel_irqchip_split; > bool sync_mmu; > bool manual_dirty_log_protect; > /* The man page (and posix) say ioctl numbers are signed int, but > @@ -1799,7 +1799,7 @@ static void kvm_irqchip_create(KVMState *s) > * in-kernel irqchip for us */ > ret = kvm_arch_irqchip_create(s); > if (ret == 0) { > - if (s->kernel_irqchip_split) { > + if (s->kernel_irqchip_split == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON) { > perror("Split IRQ chip mode not supported."); > exit(1); > } else { > @@ -2070,7 +2070,9 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms) > goto err; > } > > - s->kernel_irqchip_split = mc->default_kernel_irqchip_split; > + if (s->kernel_irqchip_split == ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO) { > + s->kernel_irqchip_split = mc->default_kernel_irqchip_split ? > ON_OFF_AUTO_ON : ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF; > + } > > if (s->kernel_irqchip_allowed) { > kvm_irqchip_create(s); > @@ -3007,17 +3009,17 @@ static void kvm_set_kernel_irqchip(Object *obj, > Visitor *v, > case ON_OFF_SPLIT_ON: > s->kernel_irqchip_allowed = true; > s->kernel_irqchip_required = true; > - s->kernel_irqchip_split = false; > + s->kernel_irqchip_split = ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF; > break; > case ON_OFF_SPLIT_OFF: > s->kernel_irqchip_allowed = false; > s->kernel_irqchip_required = false; > - s->kernel_irqchip_split = false; > + s->kernel_irqchip_split = ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF; > break; > case ON_OFF_SPLIT_SPLIT: > s->kernel_irqchip_allowed = true; > s->kernel_irqchip_required = true; > - s->kernel_irqchip_split = true; > + s->kernel_irqchip_split = ON_OFF_AUTO_ON; > break; > default: > /* The value was checked in visit_type_OnOffSplit() above. If > @@ -3040,7 +3042,7 @@ bool kvm_kernel_irqchip_required(void) > > bool kvm_kernel_irqchip_split(void) > { > - return kvm_state->kernel_irqchip_split; > + return kvm_state->kernel_irqchip_split == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON; > } > > static void kvm_accel_instance_init(Object *obj) > @@ -3049,6 +3051,7 @@ static void kvm_accel_instance_init(Object *obj) > > s->kvm_shadow_mem = -1; > s->kernel_irqchip_allowed = true; > + s->kernel_irqchip_split = ON_OFF_AUTO_AUTO; > } > > static void kvm_accel_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) These changes looks sane to me (but did not test). > > As a follow up, kernel_irqchip_allowed and kernel_irqchip_required could also > be changed to a single OnOffAuto field, I think. That would probably be a nice cleanup. > > Paolo > >