On Freitag, 17. Januar 2020 07:09:27 CET pannengy...@huawei.com wrote: > From: Pan Nengyuan <pannengy...@huawei.com> > > Use virtio_delete_queue to make it more clear. > > Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengy...@huawei.com> > --- > Changes V2 to V1: > - replace virtio_del_queue to virtio_delete_queue to make it more clear. > --- > hw/9pfs/virtio-9p-device.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/9pfs/virtio-9p-device.c b/hw/9pfs/virtio-9p-device.c > index 910dc5045e..b146387ae2 100644 > --- a/hw/9pfs/virtio-9p-device.c > +++ b/hw/9pfs/virtio-9p-device.c > @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static void virtio_9p_device_unrealize(DeviceState *dev, > Error **errp) V9fsVirtioState *v = VIRTIO_9P(dev); > V9fsState *s = &v->state; > > - virtio_del_queue(vdev, 0); > + virtio_delete_queue(v->vq); > virtio_cleanup(vdev); > v9fs_device_unrealize_common(s, errp); > }
No idea what the deprecation plans of virtio_del_queue() are; no behaviour change, so this patch is certainly not high priority. On the other hand though this change most certainly will be required on day. I can imagine Greg might want to see a more verbose commit message, but that's beyond my personal detail level, so from my side Acked-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com>
